Wednesday, December 15, 2010

From Sherrod Brown senator from Ohio

Dear Mr. Moseley:
 
Thank you for sharing your views about the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) airport screening methods.
 
Air travel in the United States should be the safest and most efficient in the world.  The Transportation Security Administration is increasing the number of Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) scanners in airports around the country as part of a program to increase security at our nation’s airports.  This new technology is able to detect concealed plastic and ceramic weapons as well as explosives that evade traditional metal detectors.  According to TSA, this screening method, including millimeter wave AIT and backscatter AIT, is safe for all passengers — including pregnant women, children, and passengers with medical devices.  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Institute for Standards and Technology, and Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory have all confirmed that this technology is safe.  In fact, travelers receive more radiation from two minutes of an airline flight than from passing through one backscatter scanner; millimeter wave scanners emit even less energy.
 
TSA has set up an alternate security measure for passengers who feel uncomfortable being screened by the body image scanner.  These individuals may decline to go through the scanner and will be patted down by a TSA officer of the same gender.  All travelers have the right to request that a pat-down be conducted in a private room and witnessed by a person of that traveler’s choice.
 
I travel frequently and pass through the same TSA screening methods as other airline passengers.  I believe that TSA must balance the need to employ enhanced security measures with privacy concerns and seek the least intrusive approaches that still assure heightened passenger safety.  I support bolstering the safeguards in place to prevent terrorists from entering our country and endangering our citizens.  However, it also makes sense to explore whether current strategies could be revised to improve privacy while still allowing TSA agents to discover concealed explosives and weapons that are not detectable by traditional methods.
 
Should relevant legislation come before the Senate, I will keep your views in mind.  For more information on your rights - and what to expect - as a traveler, you may wish to visit TSA's website at http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/index.shtm.  
 
Thank you again for getting in touch with me and thank you for your service to our nation.
 
                         Sincerely,
              
                         Sherrod Brown
                         United States Senator
 
 
 
Stay connected with what's happening in Congress.  Sign up here for regular updates on the issues you care about the most: http://brown.senate.gov/newsletter/landing 

Thursday, December 9, 2010

Monday, December 6, 2010

Dayton International Airport

Ok so let's talk TSA pat-downs (Freedom Gropes) and Advanced Imaging Technology (porno scanners). I find it extremely disturbing that the TSA can not be truthful or consistent with it's own published policies. If we look at the TSA's own website http://www.tsa.gov/travelers/pat_downs.shtm  what we see is:

What triggers a pat-down?
"Pat-downs are used to resolve alarms at the checkpoint, including those triggered by metal detectors and AIT units. Pat-downs are also used when a person opts out of AIT screening in order to detect potentially dangerous and prohibited items. Because pat-downs are specifically used to resolve alarms and prevent dangerous items from going on a plane, the vast majority of passengers will not receive a pat-down at the checkpoint."

What this doesn't mention is that 'pat-downs' will be meted out randomly at Dayton International Airport since they do not have the AIT machines. So as one flyer, Ms. Erin Chase http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHzTX8vlOzA, found out you can get a pat-down for no other reason then some TSA official selected you at random (or maybe not so random http://dailycaller.com/2010/12/06/is-the-tsa-targeting-women/)

However, after watching the interview with Ms. Chase on Happening Now broadcast on Fox News she mentioned that she witnessed random pat-downs at the gate. Since TSA's published policy stated that "Pat-downs are used to resolve alarms at the checkpoint..." I decided to investigate further. Now 'at the gate' means you have already been cleared by the TSA. You have already taken off your shoes and removed everything metallic from your being and walked through a metal detector. You have had all your other belongings x-rayed and examined by the TSA. You may have even been selected for an enhanced pat-down at random as Ms. Chase had. You are in fact in the secure 'sterile' area of the airport.

So I contacted TSA employee Jon Lisle, Program Analyst for the Federal Security Director at Dayton International Airport and I asked if TSA had a policy to randomly search and pat-down travelers at the gate. He informed me that it was in fact their policy to do just that.

So here are my questions:

1. Why is the flying public not being adequately informed of the truth with regards to TSA 'pat-downs' and how one might receive them at Dayton International Airport?

2. What are the options for a ticket holder who doesn't want to be groped by a TSA agent where there is no AIT machine in the alternative at the checkpoint?

3. What happens to a ticket holder who refuses a pat-down meted out at random after they have cleared the checkpoint and they are trying to board their plane at the gate and have given no probable cause for concern?

4. Will the TSA fine a U.S. citizen $10,000 for failing to allow himself to be groped by a government official when there is no other alternative offered?

I can tell you as businessman who employs a large number of people in Dayton that this type of draconian measure will have an impact on business travel. I contacted Congressman Michael Turner's office in whose district Dayton International Airport is located for comment and have yet to hear back.

I would also like to discuss the entire efficacy and legality of the TSA policy but I am sure that I could no better Evan DeFilippis of the Oklahoma Daily who wrote the following column: http://www.oudaily.com/news/2010/dec/06/column-nude-awakening-tsa-and-privacy/